Attorney, Robert T. Johnson — whose office had knowingly prosecuted Wise — of violating Wise’s constitutional rights. As relief, Wise’s attorneys asked the court to stop the city from enforcing the law and award him damages. They also made the initial steps required to seek contempt of court.
A series of legal victories came almost immediately. The day after the filing of the lawsuit, the Bronx D.A.’s office capitulated, admitting that it shouldn’t have prosecuted anyone under the law and issued a written agreement to stop doing so effectively immediately. Notices were sent to the Offices of the District Attorneys, to ensure that other New York City D.A.s stopped prosecuting people under the void law too. In addition, for 10 days, the NYPD read notices to officers at roll calls, directing them to cease enforcement. Satisfied that the city would make a good-faith effort to end the misconduct, the judge in the case, Shira Scheindlin, saw no reason to initiate contempt proceedings. She issued an order formerly demanding that the NYPD and the Bronx D.A. stop enforcing the law and she agreed to monitor their compliance. As for Wise’s request for damages, he would have to wait a while longer to learn if he would get any. In September 2005, the city formally denied all 156 of his allegations, indicating that the fight would be protracted.
AFTER VICTORIES, SETBACKS
Confident that there were many more Eddie Wises, Rosenfeld and Smyth spent the next year-and-half working to gather evidence of them. As word of their lawsuit spread through the community, they began collecting and documenting illegal summonses issued to other New Yorkers accused of violating the void law. By late 2006, they’d amassed ample proof the NYPD was still enforcing it. They discovered that since Judge Scheindlin had slapped the agency’s wrist in 2005, officers had issued nearly 800 illegal summonses and over 80 illegal warrants in connection with the void law. Not only were cops continuing to make illegal arrests after 2005, Scheindlin’s 2005 court order didn’t even make them slow down. It was almost as if the judgment never happened. Police had issued almost as many summonses in the 19 months after the 2005 court order as they had issued in the 19 months before it. As incredible as the figures were, Rosenfeld and Smyth weren’t surprised. The NYPD had been enforcing the void law for well over a decade. Why would it suddenly stop now?
Armed with reams of documents proving continued wrongdoing, the attorneys returned to Judge Scheindlin in November 2006. Eager for a contempt judgment, they again broached the subject with the judge, outlining their rationale. In its defense, the NYPD again claimed that it was making a sincere effort and just needed more time. To demonstrate its honest intentions, the agency rolled out another proposal to end its enforcement of the law. “I totally reject that they made a good faith effort,” says Rosenfeld of these plans. “By that point there was a lot they could have done,” she says, noting that they could have fined precinct supervisors. Nevertheless, the court refused to allow Wise’s team to file a contempt motion and, again, ordered the city to stop enforcing the law.
Scheindlin’s rejection sent Rosenfeld and Smyth back to their offices empty-handed. But their bad day in court was not a bad day for Wise. The same day, the NYPD made him an attractive offer. The city would pay him $100,001, if he dropped his class action suit. By his own estimates, Wise earned $10,000 a year from his assorted street hustles and typically carried his net worth in the pocket of a pair of jeans he wore religiously. Wise did what Wise had to do. He took the offer. In the spring of 2007, New York magazine profiled the ex-hustler. He’d opened his first bank account and resigned from his car-parking gig.
I don’t know what the lawyers for the city thought about the case, because they never returned my requests for comment. But if they thought they had found a way to end their legal troubles, they were wrong. Rosenfeld and Smyth were just starting to grasp the scale of what was happening. By now they knew there were thousands of falsely arrested people. Data they received from the Office of Court





I had to leave my house because some individuals in my area are dangerous. Since my departure my home has been broken into several times. Currently my porch is being used as a hang out, also as a drug traffic area. I was informed to put up loitering signs, so if anyone is on my property they can be moved along or arrested. What do I do when, I am being abused over and over again, by (people just hanging out getting high), does this loitering law work for me? I am an African American woman with a latin twist. Lastly for a loitering law to be in effect, does a loitering sign have to be present on private property?
[...] One of the men arrested under this voided law was a 44-year-old homeless man named Eddie Wise. After being arrested 22 times in a 2-year span for the same voided law, he decided to do something. [...]
Fantastic article!
Yet, it must be said that groups of men who are illegal aliens are seen throughout this city everyday supposedly waiting to be picked up for work. Many have been witnessed to be drinking and doing other questionable things in or near parks, business establishment etc, yet, they are not bothered by the police. In fact, in some area, such as the Port Rchmond section in Staten island,at the directive of the mayor, police cars have been dispatched to “protect” them.Why the distinction?
That’s a good question Sonia. But I wonder what you mean by “questionable things”? And if they’re not bothered by the police it must be the case that they are not breaking any laws. Keep in mind, aggressive begging is illegal, as are a number of other behaviors that go beyond the simple act of asking for money.
Flagging down cars, congregating in front of play grounds, drinking. One can only speculate how they attend to their personal sanitation needs since they gather all day long. In NYC where the primary law enforcement tactic is stopping and frisking young African American men it’s hard to imagine groups of 20-30 gathering in public without the police relentlessly harrasing them. For some, large numbers of African American men on the street is criminally suspicious. When it is illegals doing it, it’s people asking for work that unemployed African American men would gladly do. Maybe it’s time to have that discussion as well.
My favorite (also least favorite) part of this article is page 6 where the Cheat Sheet is revealed. One of the officers is asked why chose to make an arrest, and “‘he mentioned this unofficial cheat sheet that he had and pulled it out of his pocket.’ The cheat sheet contained a quick and dirty version of the laws that cops typically charged people with.” And this cheat sheet contained the void, unconstitutional anti-loitering law. Unbelievable!
I wonder how many other cities have these kinds of cheat sheets in their police departments.
Loitering. What say us about the countless thousands of Black men in NYC doing just about nothing worthwhile and the small, but critical mass wresting safety and security from the residents whose communities they terrorize. The atmosphere is littered with negativity because of these guys and the criminal elements uses them as shields. This is similar to the Taliban or other terrorist groups that use the general population to cover their worthless existence. Though valid points, this goes beyond loitering; this is about the cowards that hide among us and are given cover by hiding behind moral people and moral stances!
The community must get out of this hamster wheel themselves. The New York City police department, with their suburban, Irish/Italian/Jewish membership and heirarchy has absolutely no interest in fixing what ails Black and Latino New Yorkers. Neither does the overwhelmingly White, safe Liberals that make the living of off that of the dying. I don’t doubt yours or Judge Scheindlin earnest desire to fix what’s broken, I just don’t think those whose interest it is to profit off of the chaos that is the containment zones known as Black and poor communities will let you do it.
Only this willing to solve this problem themselves can help themselves. The German-American cop from Middle Village or Great Neck judge is going to help. No more than any Black Intellectual since MLK’s death ever has.
Great reporting, Dax!
Great article.
This stop and frisk law in New York,is absolutly Racial Profiling..Rep.Elenor Holmes Norton [D]. District of Wash. has just introduced a Bill against Racial Profiling…Hopefully,this Bill will get through Congress and Pass.In the mean-time,Blacks will have to Fight in The Courts for Our Rights as Citizens,and File Racial Profiling Law-Suits.Let’s Fight for Our Rights as Citizens.No one has a Right To Determine What a Person Should Look Like or Dress Like.
Great article.
Great insight…great info…good stuff! I have officially been informed! Thanks Brother!
You’re welcome! Thanks for reading!
Thank you for this very informative article… Wish there was a class action for, stop and frisk! That is ruining lives criminalizing black and brown people just going about their daily business not doing anything illegal.
iiis,
Stop and frisk is definitely on the judicial horizon. The maneuverings are already happening. And when it does finally come to trial, Judge Scheindlin will be the one hearing it, which could be very important given her history and understanding NYPD policing culture.